NEW YORK, New York, February 2, 2009 (ENS) – It’s hard to imagine standing in midtown Manhattan, but wetlands do exist within New York City, and they both protect the city and need protection themselves, according to a report released Friday by Mayor Michael Bloomberg.
A man-made extended detention basin in the Staten Island Bluebelt after one growing season.
“Many New Yorkers don’t realize there are thousands of acres of wetlands in the five boroughs,” said Mayor Bloomberg. “Wetlands are robust ecosystems that perform crucial environmental functions like trapping pollutants, capturing stormwater runoff, sequestering carbon dioxide, and moderating storm surges.”
Today, the city has only one percent of its historic freshwater wetlands and 10 percent of its historic tidal wetlands.
These tidal remaining wetlands are concentrated in Brooklyn around Jamaica Bay, in Queens, and in Staten Island, which also has freshwater wetlands.
Freshwater wetlands smaller than 12.4 acres are not protected by state law and are vulnerable to determinations that they are outside of the scope of federal protection.
The new report shows that the extent of these smaller wetlands in New York City is not fully known.
To gather more information on the smaller freshwater wetlands, the report recommends developing new high-resolution aerial and satellite wetland maps to precisely determine the size and location of unprotected wetlands before pursuing other options outlined in the report. This mapping is scheduled to start later this year.
“In PlaNYC, we promised to study wetlands and build on wetland successes like the impressive Staten Island Bluebelt stormwater project managed by the Department of Environmental Protection, as well as the thousands of acres of wetlands managed by the Parks Department,” said the mayor.
The Staten Island Bluebelt is an award winning, ecologically sound and cost-effective stormwater management for about one third of Staten Island’s land area. The program preserves natural drainage corridors, including streams, ponds, and other wetland areas, saving tens of millions of dollars in infrastructure costs when compared to providing conventional storm sewers for the same land area.
“The critical role that wetlands play in the Staten Island Bluebelt system demonstrates the ability of wetlands to improve water quality by removing nutrients, waste, and sediment from stormwater runoff,” the report states.
The study also identifies threats to wetlands that are not from a lack of regulatory protection, but rather from the existing polluted or degraded condition of wetlands that may have been caused by rising sea levels and stormwater runoff.
In addition, submerged lands policy will be more important as sea levels rise in response to climate change. While open waters are subject to extensive state and federal regulatory protections, the city lacks a comprehensive submerged lands management policy.
To address these threats, the city’s Climate Adaptation Task Force will release a report on policies for the adaptation of wetlands and other critical infrastructure later this year.
The city is also exploring alternative funding, mitigation banking and other mechanisms for improved restoration and maintenance of wetlands.
New York City and other municipalities in the state can request that the state designate any remaining wetlands below 12.4 acres to be of “unusual local importance” and thus within state protection.
Recent decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court have weakened the protection of “isolated” wetlands. As a result, the report suggests that the city conduct a thorough study of the hydrological and ecological connection between wetlands and U.S. navigable waters that are clearly covered by the Clean Water Act, to bring those areas more clearly within the jurisdiction of federal regulators.
The city could impose zoning overlay districts on private wetlands or buffer areas or both, and possibly extend that protection to near shore and other underwater lands.
The report suggests that the city could create a local wetland regulatory permitting scheme that would protect smaller freshwater wetlands below 12.4 acres, or buffer areas, or both.
Finally, the report suggests that the city could allocate more resources to the restoration or management of city-owned wetlands and acquire more privately-owned wetlands.
Click here to view the report, which fulfills one of the 127 commitments in Mayor Bloomberg’s PlaNYC.
Copyright Environment News Service (ENS) 2009. All rights reserved.
The question is no longer whether global warming is upon us … but how we can rise to its challenge.
MIT’s Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change is a world leader in this effort. Our many activities cohere around one strategy: science and policy have to work together.
Climate change is complex, so understanding it requires cutting-edge scientific research. Applying that research to moderate the most dangerous effects of climate change requires unprecedented action and cooperation across national boundaries.
Advancing both frontiers – research on natural science and on economic policy – is our unique mission. Joint Program researchers explore the interplay between global environmental systems and human activities, and the potential impact of policies intended to stabilize this relationship.
Our latest studies are helping the U.S. Congress weigh the pros and cons of bills that propose to set different limits on greenhouse gases. The Joint Program’s sophisticated number crunching and analyses show legislators to what extent their emission targets will slow global warming and how associated rules may affect the economy. Our analyses provide detailed scenarios describing the impacts on different segments of society resulting from different costs of controlling emissions of greenhouse gases.
Other Joint Program research demonstrates that just as there are costs to cutting down on greenhouse gases, there are significant economic gains – especially where human health is concerned. For example, our researchers predict positive health impacts if China were to increase regulations of industrial pollutants. Compelling arguments have been presented that decisions about regulating greenhouse gases and airborne pollutants should include considerations of health costs and benefits.
In addition, Joint Program scientists are now working on challenges such as the following:
At the heart of much of this work lies MIT’s Integrated Global System Model, a set of mathematical tools for investigating connections between the Earth’s ecosystems and the world’s economies. By constantly refining and re-running this model, we can estimate the likelihood of different changes and demonstrate the potential costs and benefits of specific policies – essential inputs to international dialogue toward a global response to climate change.
Technical and popular publications bring the results of the Joint Program’s insights to the public. We communicate directly with national and international policy-making bodies and with other researchers. We also host the semi-annual MIT Global Change Forum, which brings together experts and decision-makers from industry, government, academia, research institutes, and NGOs, to discuss the wide variety of issues related to global change.
Through our research, publications, conferences, and testimony, the Joint Program serves fellow scientists, as well as government and corporate leaders, policy makers, and a worldwide citizenry.